Consumers say safer driver assistance technology is now more important than self-driving cars

Drivers very much want automakers to improve existing driver support features before developing autonomous vehicles (AVs), and recent crash tests have confirmed that inconsistent performance remains an issue with these semi-autonomous systems currently on the market.

Those are the main distinguishing features new search Released on Thursday by AAA Car group.

“You can’t sell consumers into the future if they don’t trust the present,” Greg Brannon, director of automotive engineering at AAA, said in a statement. “And drivers tell us they expect their current driving assistance technology to operate safely all the time. Unfortunately, our testing shows that choppy performance is the rule rather than the exception.”

The results of the search are displayed in the report.Active Driving Assistance Performance May 2022Based on consumer survey results and recent crash tests.

A survey of 1,107 adults earlier this year of consumer attitudes supported the continued poor performance of ADAS: Most respondents (77% compared to 18%) said they were more interested in improved vehicle safety systems than they were themselves. Car driving.

Public skepticism about self-driving cars was reinforced by a series of new performance crash test results that found that vehicles with Active Driving Assistance System (also known as Level 2 systems) consistently failed to avoid hitting another car or bicycle during 15 test runs.

For example, a head-on collision occurred during all fifteen tests of an oncoming vehicle within the travel lane; In only one test car, speed was significantly reduced before an accident at each run.

Vehicles used in the evaluation included: 2021 Subaru Forester with “EyeSight®”; A 2021 Hyundai Santa Fe with “Highway Driving Assist” and a 2020 Tesla Model 3 with “Autopilot,” AAA said, noting that “malfunctions occurred regardless of the make and model of the car.”

from Report:

“While the refinement of available active driving assistance systems is improved, drivers must remain constantly engaged in the driving task. The search vehicles performed as expected during closed lane testing for routine situations, such as approaching a slow-moving vehicle or a cyclist from behind. However, All test vehicles collided either with the simulated passenger car or with the adult cyclist multiple times during the “edge of the vehicle” test, such as with a vehicle approaching from the front or with the cyclist crossing directly in front of the test vehicle.”

The fact that the drive systems have successfully detected cars and cyclists slowly traveling the same lane during assessments was promising, said Brannon, director of automotive engineering at AAA, but that “the failure to detect a cross bike rider or an oncoming vehicle is worrisome.”

“Direct collision is the most lethal kind, and these systems need to be improved in the situations where they can help the most,” he added.

The report indicated that consumer distrust of fully self-driving vehicles remains high: 85% said they were afraid or unsure of self-driving technology, and when transporting their children or loved ones, 85% also said they would not be comfortable using a self-driving car. Self-driving vehicle.

The auto group said it “is urging automakers to listen to consumers and improve what’s currently available before focusing on future technology.”

To read the full report, click here.